<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Pass@K on Aakash Thatte</title><link>https://sky-2002.github.io/tags/pass@k/</link><description>Recent content in Pass@K on Aakash Thatte</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://sky-2002.github.io/tags/pass@k/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>What RL Actually Changes in a Model</title><link>https://sky-2002.github.io/posts/2026-08-30-tiny-rlvr-01/</link><pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://sky-2002.github.io/posts/2026-08-30-tiny-rlvr-01/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;I have been following the discourse around RL, hearing a lot of terminology (like async RL, sample efficiency etc) and how people are using it to post-train models, and I did RL on smaller models like Qwen by following the docs of trl, unsloth.
I could see the rewards going up, sometimes wiggling, sometimes 0, at times answer still being wrong at the end of training. I knew the math, the code, but I wanted to go deeper and had a lot of questions, like: &lt;strong&gt;what exactly changes in a model&amp;rsquo;s behaviour after RL?&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;strong&gt;does it depend on how the pretraining was done?&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;strong&gt;how stale can the rollouts be?&lt;/strong&gt; - and many more. So I did some experiments and now writing this post to present those.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>